• Only 21 individuals had listed they had earned PHR or SPHR certification (none listed GPHR).  This number could be higher, but some either chose not to list it, or they may have let certification lapse.
• Less than 60 had a formal business education (i.e., a BBA or post-graduate degree in a business-related field).  Some only listed their college, but did not list their educational background.  Others did not have education as part of their LinkedIn profile. 
• Of that 60 or so, less than 25 concentrated in human resources as part of their undergraduate or graduate education.

1. Is pursuit of certification perceived as valuable?  If a significant portion of those who are perceived as being knowledgeable on the field of HR (or at least a major subset of the field) do not possess certification from SHRM, will some choose not to pursue it as well, as they do not see it as necessary to succeed in the industry?
2. Barriers to entry in the field of HR continue to be low.  Again, many of the individuals on this list have demonstrated through on-the-job experience and success that they deserve to be lauded.  But, it should concern SHRM that many apparently do not need a HR education to be successful in HR.
3. The need to embrace social and its impact on membership.  SHRM has done a wonderful job over the past couple of years of working with many on this list.  Over 50 on the list served on the social media team at the 2013 SHRM Annual Conference in Chicago.  However, with many on the list having little to no affiliation with SHRM, will some HR professionals wonder why they should join SHRM when others are possibly providing valuable information for free?

• In their volunteer leader resource center, chapters can contact the SHRM Speakers Bureau to find a member of the SHRM organization to speak on a whole host of topics.
• There is a short non-SHRM staff directory of speakers who have scored 3.8 out of 5 at one of the SHRM major conferences in the last four years
• A SHRM speaker program that contains just under 130 speakers

• In 2010, the SHRM Chapter and State Council Leadership LinkedIn Group tried to create a list of top 10 speakers from their state conference.  Everyone who commented thought it was a good idea, but it withered on the vine.
• Late last year, the St. Norbert Collge student SHRM chapter tried to crowdsource a list.ly list of good SHRM speakers (you can see it posted on the right), but it hasn't quite taken off.

The Voice of HR site has been running an excellent series of blogposts offering suggestions to improve SHRM entitled "2011 SHRM Strategic Guidance." My contribution was published Sunday morning and I am reproducing it here. Go check out Voice of HR for more interesting thoughts.

One of my favorite movies is Terry Gilliam’s “Brazil,” which tells the story of a lonely bureaucrat (Sam Lowry) railing against the system in the hopes of winning the heart of his true love. As a long-time SHRM volunteer at the local, state, and national level, dealing with SHRM can often make me feel like Sam Lowry (though love rarely had anything to do with it).

I currently serve in the role of District Director for the WI SHRM State Council. In May and October, we held chapter president forums to discuss general state council expectations as well as the strategic role of SHRM. Using quotes from the movie, “Brazil,” I will highlight the good, bad, and ugly of SHRM from the perspective of our local leaders.

Jack Lint: “This is information retrieval not information dispersal.”

This is a mixed affair. On the one hand, SHRM send a TON of e-mail. In October alone, I received over 20 e-mails (not including several duplicates) from the SHRM Store, HR Week, SHRM Education, SHRM Express Requests, etc. As a District Director, it is expected we pass along a lot of this information. However, it is often difficult to separate the signal versus the noise; the relevant from the non-relevant.

On the other hand, SHRM gathers a lot of information, which is not necessarily shared. All chapters and state councils are required to fill out a Chapter Leadership Information Form (CLIF), which provides SHRM with information about who is involved in the various roles. However, this information is rarely conveyed back to the chapters and state councils themselves. Core Leadership Directors are often left to fend for themselves to determine who fulfills the College Relations or Government Affairs role for a chapter. Similarly, SHRM holds on to the at-large list of members like it was gold, and getting access to it is more difficult than a camel going through the eye of a needle.

Suggestions

1. Limit the e-mails, or at the very least, give me the option of choosing when to receive them (daily, weekly, etc.). We have the option to opt out of receiving e-mails, but not the choice.
2. Once the CLIFs are received, send out the list of chapter leaders to the respective Core Leadership Directors
3. Free the at-large list. Trust the state and chapter leaders to use those lists with discretion.

Harry Tuttle: “Listen, this old system of yours could be on fire and I couldn’t even turn on the kitchen tap without filling out a 27b/6… Bloody paperwork”

Sam Lowry: “Sorry, I’m a bit of a stickler for paperwork. Where would we be if we didn’t follow the correct procedures?”

Harry Tuttle: “Listen, kid, we’re all in it together.”

Collaboration amongst chapter leaders is highly encouraged, but carried out ineffectively. A prime example of this involves recommended and HRCI-approved speaker lists for chapter meetings, state conferences, and the national conference. It is rare for a chapter leader in Green Bay to know what quality speakers have served at other chapters in the state, let alone across state lines.

Suggestions

1. Create a national database of HRCI-approved programs. Chapters can look at the HRCI website and select a speaker that meets their demands
2. Shift the burden for becoming a certified program from the chapter to the speaker, and expand the Approved Provider program. Any speaker who wishes to speak to a SHRM chapter should have to get approved by HRCI. As speakers get recognized, their topics would be added to the database.
3. Recruit past state conference programming co-chairs to serve as panel members to review RFPs for the SHRM Annual Conference. While this duty is currently performed by SHRM staff, the experience of these volunteers would improve the quality of programming at the national level.

Dawson: “I’m glad to see the Ministry’s continuing its tradition of recruiting the brightest and best, sir.”

While Dawson’s quote is intended to be sarcastic, one of the best aspects of SHRM is its volunteers. Hundreds take time out of their busy schedule to serve the organization. However, as expectations of volunteers have grown, the sheer number of meetings, webinars, and conference calls are turning many away, particular in this tough economic climate. Those that do volunteer are not recognized. As one member put it, “It used to be that SHRM sent out a constant reminder that it is a volunteer organization. That message no longer is stated and many volunteers no longer feel that appreciated.” Perks are offered at the local chapter, but it is not enough to attract volunteers.

Suggestions

1. While the current discount for registration at the SHRM Annual Conference is $55, is that significant enough to truly recognize the hard work of volunteer leaders?
2. Create SHRM Pinnacle Volunteer Leader Awards. While SHRM recognizes the significant and innovative work that chapters perform with the Pinnacle Awards at the SHRM Leadership Conference, why not recognize the significant volunteer work at the SHRM Leadership Conference and at SHRM Annual.

Charlie, Department of Works: “Bloody typical, they’ve gone back to metric without telling us.”

Of late, it has been felt by several chapter leaders that there has been too much emphasis on SHRM membership. To some, it gives the perception that there is a problem at SHRM. Are many members no longer renewing? Further, the percentage growth for SHRM membership in the SHAPE document was too demanding, especially for only one year. Some felt it was unfeasible, particularly in today’s economic environment. Further, it focuses too much on numbers instead of the substance of services to members.

Suggestions

1. Lose the tote bag promotion. If you need to attract members by offering a tote bag as a lure, something is amiss. If you have to offer an incentive, why not offer a discount to the SHRM book store or an additional discount to attend a SHRM conference?
2. Lower the percentage growth rate for chapters.

Brazil, where hearts were entertaining
We stood beneath an amber moon
And softly murmured someday soon
We kissed and clung together

Then, tomorrow was another day
Morning found me miles away
With still a million things to say

Now, when twilight dims the sky above
Recalling thrills of our love
There’s one thing I’m certain of
Return I will to old Brazil

Music by Ary Barraso/English lyrics by S.K. “Bob” Russell

With the suggestions made above, there’s one thing I’m certain of….Return I will to old SHRM!

RESOLVED: The HRCI Certification process for chapters is broken.

Prologue

The primary reasons HR professionals attend chapter meetings are networking and earning recertification credits toward their PHR or SPHR. People do enjoy talking with another and seeing what is going on in the HR world in their little neck of the woods. Yet, it is the quality of the session/topic being offered that is the primary driver of attendance. If the topic is poor or the speaker is of low quality, the networking is simply not strong enough to devote 2.5 hours of one's time to a SHRM chapter meeting.

The Problem

Finding quality speakers is a difficult process. Chapter volunteers have to go out and find willing speakers (at no or reasonable cost) to provide a compelling hour or more of information to attendees. As anyone who as attended several meetings, the quality of the speaker can be hit-or-miss. Complicating matters is getting a chapter program to be certified by HRCI.

Having been involved with chapter boards and state councils for a number of years, working to get a meeting or conference is a constant challenge. Chapters have to submit a program a minimum 4 weeks to get approval for credit. Even then, it is a battle back-and-forth to finally get the needed approval. Anecdotally, I have heard of several instances where chapters have taken programs and/or speakers that have previously been successfully approved (when offered by another chapter), only to be turned down when submitted for a second time. HRCI even notes that a program should be "re-submitted every calendar year, even if the activity does not change from year to year." Simply, it is a lot of jumping through hoops.

The Solution
1. HRCI should create a national database of pre-approved programs

*There are more then 575 chapters, a significant number of state conferences, and the national conference
*Most chapters have 9 monthly meetings a year (as most take off summer months), with most of these meetings offering certification credit

Doing the simple math (575*9) tells me that is a total of 5,175 sessions approved per year. If we go 3 years back, that is a total of 15,525 different sessions. Let's say that 25% of those are repeats from another chapter or conference,and we add in all the state and national conference speakers, and we are talking over 11,500 sessions that HRCI has approved.

STOP THE MADNESS! Create a database listing all of these sessions by state, topic, speaker, credit amount (i.e., 1.25 hours), and certification level (PHR, SPHR, GPHR, etc.). Make it easier for the chapter volunteer to find the topic and speaker of choice.

2. Shift the burden for becoming a certified program from the chapter to the speaker; expand the Approved Provider program

If #1 above is accomplished, there might be concern that topics might become stale or out-of-date, and the 11,500+ programs would quickly decrease. Surfing the HRCI website, I discovered that HRCI offers an Approved Provider program:

The Approved Provider Program is for organizations that offer multiple HR-related continuing education activities per year. Approved Providers are awarded a three-year contract in which all your qualified HR activities that you submit to us are pre-approved for recertification credit. After three years, you can continue your Approved Provider status when you renew your contract.

Tomorrow I head to Washington D.C. to participate in the SHRM Leadership Conference. One of the topics at the forefront of my mind will be the subject of student certification.

Last year, SHRM and HRCI decided to change the eligibility requirements for the PHR exam for graduating students. Currently, any student can take the PHR exam, and, if they pass, they must complete 2 years of exempt level HR experience over the next 5 years to be able to use the PHR designation. In 2011, students will no longer be eligible to take the PHR exam. They must first earn the two years of exempt HR experience.

With that said, SHRM is currently exploring alternative solutions to the PHR exam.

What should this solution look like? What would/should the alternative exam cover? As a recruiter looking at a recent graduate, what skills, competencies, or certification would give that student "legitimacy" that passing the PHR exam might currently convey?